Sunday, 2 April 2017

Many famous scientists have something in common—they didn’t work long hours.

After his morning walk and breakfast, Darwin was in his study by 8 and worked a steady hour and a half. At 9:30 he would read the morning mail and write letters. At 10:30, Darwin returned to more serious work, sometimes moving to his aviary, greenhouse, or one of several other buildings where he conducted his experiments. By noon, he would declare, “I’ve done a good day’s work,” and set out on a long walk on the Sandwalk, a path he had laid out not long after buying Down House. (Part of the Sandwalk ran through land leased to Darwin by the Lubbock family.) When he returned after an hour or more, Darwin had lunch and answered more letters. At 3 he would retire for a nap; an hour later he would arise, take another walk around the Sandwalk, then return to his study until 5:30, when he would join his wife, Emma, and their family for dinner. On this schedule he wrote 19 books, including technical volumes on climbing plants, barnacles, and other subjects; the controversial Descent of Man; and The Origin of Species, probably the single most famous book in the history of science, and a book that still affects the way we think about nature and ourselves.

Even in today’s 24/7, always-on world, we can blend work and rest together in ways that make us smarter, more creative, and happier.

Scientists who spent 25 hours in the workplace were no more productive than those who spent five.

Darwin is not the only famous scientist who combined a lifelong dedication to science with apparently short working hours.

The 60-plus-hour-a-week researchers were the least productive of all.

The best students generally followed a pattern of practicing hardest and longest in the morning, taking a nap in the afternoon, and then having a second practice.




http://nautil.us/issue/46/balance/darwin-was-a-slacker-and-you-should-be-too

Japan, Australia, Netherlands - GDP grew without recession for 25 years and more


- Australia GDP grew for 25 years because of its resources.

- Netherlands's GDP grew for over 25 years after oil was discovered offshore.

- So, natural resources can help drive GDP growth for a long time.

- Australia grew for the past 25 years primarily due to exports to China. In 1991, exports to China were 2% of Australia's total exports. In 2017, it was 33%.

- Of Australia's GDP growth of 3.5% , 2% is accounted for due to population growth and 1.5% due to increase in resources investment.

Summary: India's GDP can also grow for a very very long time because of the huge population and increasing consumption.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-30/as-australia-eyes-victory-on-growth-its-spoils-look-bittersweet