Sunday, 30 October 2016

Investment philosophy is Where is the cash? - free cash-flows

Summary: 

1. Check for free cash flows generation capability of a company for next 5-10 years.
Ultimately numbers don’t lie and what matters the most is the free cash flows of companies, not the P&L account.

2. QGLP is value investing and margin of safety. Quality of business and management, Growth, and Long-term sustainability are the 'value' part of the equation and 'Price' is the price part of the equation.

3. Distribution is the 'moat' of Page industries. It is likely to sustain its distribution competition for the next 10 years.

4. Page industries products are priced in the mid-premium to high-premium range.

5. Eicher Motor's Royal Enfield is priced in the mid-premium range Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.

Your note: The mid-premium range seems to be the sweet spot for niche companies and to make good margins. There is no point in making value-for-money products for millions. Those kinds of business are highly competitive and require different kind of distribution, products, people and R&D. Mid-premium and premium products require different kind of distribution, products, people and R&D. It is very difficult for the same company to address both the markets. 



Oct 30, 2016, 08.31 PM |

Manish Sonthalia (more) VP & Fund Manager, Motilal Oswal Mutual Fund |

Source: CNBC-TV18

Free cash flows of cos drives investment decisions for Sonthalia Deep-dive into the free-cash-flow generation capability of a company over at least the following 5-10 years is a must for Manish Sonthalia, CIO & Director at Motilal Oswal PMS to consider investing in it. "Ultimately, numbers don’t lie," he says.

Free cash flows of cos drives investment decisions for Sonthalia

A deep-dive into the free-cash-flow generation capability of a company over at least the following 5-10 years is a must for Manish Sonthalia, CIO and Director at Motilal Oswal PMS to consider investing in it. "Ultimately, numbers don’t lie," he says.

In a candid chat with BSE and NSE Member Ramesh Damani in a special series Wizards of Dalal Street on CNBC-TV18, Sonthalia shares Motilal's principles and methodologies of investing.
The fund house follows an in-house formula called QGLP for picking up stocks, he says, adding, it is nothing but a margin of safety where 'Q' is for the quality of business and management, 'G' stands for the growth prospects, 'L' for longevity of growth and whether competitive advantages are structural or cyclical and 'P' is  the price.

He notes these factors are critical as cost of capital in India is pretty high which results in nearly 65-70 percent businesses barely managing to earn even the cost of capital which ideally suggests they should be trading at nothing over 1 times on price to book value.

Sonthalia also shares insights on some of his early-bird picks like Page Industriesand Eicher Motors which gave blockbuster returns.

Below is the verbatim transcript of Manish Sonthalia’s interview to Ramesh Damani on CNBC-TV18.

Q: There is a very popular book ‘All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten’. You learnt investing from watching your dad’s portfolio?

A: Yes, the story began some 25 years ago after I passed out of class 12 and I was a science student obviously inquisitive about the how and why of things. My dad is a practicing chartered accountant so had some stocks in the portfolio which always did well.

He used to get good dividends and good dividends increased every year and at the same there were some stocks like Tata Iron and Steel, very cyclical, they went up but they came down, dividends were erratic or not there. That made me wonder as to what made stocks move.

Q: Let me take you to 2004, the Motilal Oswal of Motilal Oswal called you for a job?

A: That is correct. One fine morning sometime in July or August of 2004 I got a call from him asking me whether I was keen to join them.

Q: Did you think it was a crank call?

A: No, I didn’t. The serious voice that spoke on the other side convinced me. He wanted me to come over to Mumbai and face an interview with Raamdeo Agrawal and himself and if I could have cleared that, obviously he was willing to hire me. So, I came, I gave the interview, got selected and now I am here.

Q: The early part that shaped your investment philosophy was where is the cash. How did that shape the first years of your investment business?

A: I must say that whatever I am today so far is all been due to the learning’s of this organisation. Motilal Oswal, that has created the foundation. Ultimately numbers don’t lie and what matters the most is the free cash flows of companies, not the P&L account, profit balance; that is the determinant to the free cash flows and if you are able to gauge how much cash flow the business is going to earn over lifetime or maybe next 5-15 years, it is nothing but the present value of the future cash flow.

So, that is what we focused on and of course Rammdeo Agrawal, he is a great teacher, how he creates, how he goes about explaining how businesses are and what matters and what doesn’t matter and that created the foundation, made me perfectly believe that if you got to get stock prices right, you better get a handle on the cash that the company is going to make over long period of time.

Q: As you progressed in your job, I have heard a lot of abbreviations in my time, SOS, IOU, GOI, PMO but you guys believe in a different abbreviation, tell me about it.

A: The term is called QGLP. This is nothing but the margin of safety. QGL is the value piece, P is the price, difference between value and price is the margin of safety. The value component has been broken down into three that is Q, G, L where Q is the quality as measured through quality of business and quality of management, G is the growth part -- we want to buy growth businesses so we are following a growth at a reasonable price (GARP) method of investing and longevity of growth is understanding whether the moat or the competitive advantage of businesses are structural or cyclical.

Q: Give me a couple of qualitative and quantitative factors that are very important to you? 

A: Quality, we have two components, one is the quality of business as measured through return on capital employed and free cash flow. 

At the same time, the quality of the management is quite important. A good business run by a bad management or a bad business run by a good management, answer is a not for you. Only if a good business is run by a good management we will have a winner.

So, understanding and gauging the quality of the management is equally important and that requires a lot of experience and whole lot of methodology and we have evolved and developed few of the forensics that we use quantitatively to gauge whether the management is of high quality. 

Q: You don’t think it is beating the return on capital right, the cost of capital? 

A: In India the cost of capital is pretty high. We have very few businesses -- 65-70 percent of the businesses in India don’t even earn cost of capital, just about meets cost of capital. They should be trading at maybe one time price to book. 

Q: And don’t deserve a place in your portfolio according to you?

A: You won’t be beating the markets.

Q: In certain stocks you have not only doubled but you made 40 times your money. One of them is Page Industries. Tell me how did you chance upon that stock?

A: I had some understanding about the hosiery businesses. Coming from Kolkata you have some of the old names – and if you went through the Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP), we bought into the stock just about after the IPO came. So, if you have gone through the DRHP, you understood how the businesses actually were very successfully managed by them in the Philippines. If you did some internal research, desktop research for yourself, you would have been able to figure out what they were intending to do.

Then it was all about going to be factories in Bangalore and understanding what they are wanting to do and obviously it was an aspirational brand; you knew it because American brand (Jockey) -- 100-year-old product -- here they were positioning the product at a very reasonable price point so they were offering value for money. Market was expanding, they were doubling every five years, he was present in the mid-premium and the super-premium category which was growing faster than the market.

Q: What was his moat?

A: His moat is his distribution according to me. This distribution advantage, which he has will be there even today for the next 10 years.

Q: Despite the stock doubling and doubling and then doubling some more what gives you the confidence to stay on? Is it the sheer numbers that come every quarter?

A: Long-term is made up of many short-terms and if the short-term, the numbers do come, you just got to figure out what should be the terminal value and terminal value to determine you understand the nuts and bolts of what will make that much. As long as you are confident about these numbers coming, then it is just extrapolating what is the price to earnings multiple that should be for that business.

Q: Another stock that has been very successful for you, let us go to their strategy. Eicher Motors has been a fabulous stock, one of the great winners of the 2007 bull market. You spotted it young, tell me the exciting story behind Eicher.

A: Eicher had been a fascinating story but we looked into Eicher initially for their trucking business, when they tied up with Volvo. They opened the joint venture (JV) but it was not doing that well. They were going about it but slow and steady. Then I happened to read an interview of Siddhartha Lal and he was also equally optimistic about the Royal Enfield business. However, it was doing meager numbers those days, 50,000 units.

In a category of motorcycles, where numbers were big even those days, the entire category was growing, doubling every seven years. So, growth rates were 10-11 percent in volume terms. Here we were talking about company which was setting 50,000 units but it was an aspirational product owned by the British Navy Royal Enfield and the Bullet and the Classic 350 which is the best selling bike just kept on ramping numbers and margins kept on increasing.

Q: He is in a sweet spot in terms of segmentation you say?

A: Absolutely. He has created the segment for himself. He does not compete with scooters, he does not compete with commuting motorcycles, he does not compete with ultimately ultimate leisure biking.

Q: He owns this segment?

A: He owns the segment and even today there is no major competition that is coming through. If he has priced its product very sweetly between Rs 1,00,000 to Rs 1,50,000, that range, he will continue to be a winner. There is of course competition trying to position their own products within that segment but he is miles ahead of them and to get latent demand in the system for these sort of bikes is roughly around 2 million units. Today he is at 60,0,000 units. 

Q: Lot of headroom?

A: Lot of headroom to go and the market hopefully should be growing at about the motorcycle category growth rate for long period of time.

Q: When you first buy a stock, Page, Eicher, anything else, is there bit of heart pounding goes on, are you unsure, do you know that is going to be a winner, is there something that your bloodstream tells you?

A: Mentally I try to figure out the P&L account model at least for the next three years. Looking beyond that is difficult to take a call on but based on my understanding about the business, what would make money for those businesses, just try to figure out how much money this business is going to make in the next three to five years.

Q: So it comes down again to numbers and cash flow? 

A: 100 percent, nothing else works. According to me, value investing is understanding growth investing as far as India is concerned. Benjamin Graham’s definition of value, the strictest definition of the term would not apply to India because bulk of the businesses are earning less than cost of capital, how does low P/E stocks would make or create wealth for you. It is about growth, understanding growth and how much cash flow these businesses are going to make. 

Q: The way India is shaping up, there are and there will be a lot of structural stories coming through with good quality management. So, investors, I have missed Page and Eicher, can either buy Page, Eicher again or some other stocks, do you feel that opportunity is still there?

A: Today bulk of the value is getting captured in the private equity space. However, at the same time we will have umpteen numbers of opportunities even in the listed equity space. So, one thing which I look forward to also, is to understand how much the profit pool is going to grow and how many players this profit pool is going to get shared with. So, if you have consolidated sectors, I as a fund manager try to figure out whether company A is going to do well or company B is going to do well or company C, if they all fit into the QGLP framework. My job is easier if there is a growing profit pool and a consolidated space.


Thursday, 20 October 2016

Havells MD on M&A and advertising

Interview with Anil Rai Gupta, Havells, Chairman & MD


On M&A

Interviewer: Are you looking to acquire Llyod's business?
Anil: Anything which adds to:
- product category
- geography
- channel
these are the kind of acquisitions we would like to do.


On Advertising 

Interviewer: Margins have come down this quarter due to higher spends on advertising

Anil: We see advertisements as investments in brand building. Currently, the market is down. When market recovers we expect the investments in advertising to pay-off over the next 2-3 years.

Source: Interview in Mint Newspaper, Oct 20, 2016



Ecom Express experience


All the founders have worked in logistics space before. For example Krishnan, CEO & co-founder, Ecom express says he spent 25 years in the space. There is nothing he knows other than logistics. He was heading ecommerce logistics set-up at Blue Dart before he quit and started this firm.

2012 - Four founder quit their job at Blue Dart and started the firm with Rs. 7 crores (Rs. 5.5 crores from Oliphans Capital, an early stage investor and the rest from founders).

Early 2014 - Ecom express was delivering in 60 cities. The founders did not want to raise equity capital so soon. 'We wanted to have traction and show our business to people before we hit the market.' says Krishnan.

The founders decided to borrow money from the market. Krishnan pledged his house in Delhi. They also borrowed from an angel investor. They managed to borrow Rs. 4 crores.

June 2014 - Raised around Rs. 80 crores from Peepul capital

Once the money came, they expanded to 200 cities from 60 cities. Deliveries increased from 45,000 in June to 120,000 by October.

June 2015 - Announced funding of Rs. 850 crores from global PE firm Warbug Pincus.

Other notes:
- Krishnan says that logistics market is huge
- It can support 4 or 5 big players
- In China, there are many multi-billion dollar logistics companies
- He says ecommerce companies could eventually focus on marketing. Logistics companies will take care of logistics, even warehousing. Even for big firms like Amazon and Flipkart.
- His comments on hyper-local delivery logistics
Companies need a density of orders and order size beyond Rs 500-600.
This business needs lot of capital till the companies grow.
My view is companies should not focus on multiple cities. They should take one city at a time and then go to another city to replicate it. You can't have burn rates in multiple cities at the same time.
- They should focus on one city, build the infrastructure, delivery points, have their own people to handle delivery, only then this model works.
- This is a highly capital-intensive business and thus break-evens take much longer. The gestation period could be 6-8 years.
- Only when the order density improves can the business become profitable, until then companies need lot of capital.

http://www.livemint.com/Companies/4akh4nn0zJ2b8AtDKo6dlM/Ecom-Express-Cashing-on-the-ecommerce-wave.html

Profits vs Growth

Note; In all industries below, profits is what matters eventually.

Travel Industry

Interview with CFO, Anil Khandelwal, Cox & Kings

My observation: Cox & Kings primarily focused on 'packaged tours' while other players like Makemytrip, Cleartrip, Goibibo, and Yatra focused on flight ticket booking and hotel bookings.

The competition in flight booking and hotel booking is intense. In flight booking, the margins are wafer thin (5-7%). The margins in hotel business are better (10-20%). However, because of heavy competition, all players are under-cutting each other. Especially,  emergence of players like oyo, treebo, fabhotels etc., has intensified the competition in hotel bookings.

In fact, in FY 15, Makemytrip made a loss of $89 million (about Rs. 600 crores loss)  on revenue of $169 million (Rs. 1,100 crores). Goibibo made a loss of $69 million ( Rs. 450 crores) on revenue of $91 million (Rs. 600 crores).

So, competition is that bad. What does a smart player do in such a market scenario?

Well, Cox & Kings side-stepped the low margin airline ticket booking business and heavy competition hotel booking business, instead it is focusing on 'packaged tours' business. So, it doesn't bleed much. When things settle down, may be it can selectively start getting the other business.

So, this is what smart players have to do in a heavy competition market. They have to play 'smart' and let the growth-chasers raise capital and perish when no capital is available.

Other points that the CFO makes:

- Travel sector is highly under-penetrated in India.
- There is enough space for more players to come into this industry (this seems to be the theme across industries. Industry sizes of travel, retail, logistics are so large that there is space for many players and atleast 4 or 5 large players). This is not a winner takes it all scenario.
- One interesting point the CFO makes is that they see online and offline as just two points of sale. And both allow customers to choose packaged holidays as per their convenience.
- Customer may prefer off-the-shelf packaged holidays because they don't have to worry about planning everything. We do it for them.

Retail Industry

Similar strategy seems to have been played by D-Mart's founder Radhakishan Dhamani. He started may be a year or two later than Big Bazaar's Kishore Biyani. While Biyani focused on rapid growth, Damani focused on profits. Eventually, we see now that Damani's firm is many times more valuable than Biyani's.

In fact, Biyani tried to do so many things - groceries, apparel, real-estate, kirana format, financial services, etc., - he did not do well in any of them. Damani tested and perfected one format, he continues to do well.

Logistics Industry

Ecom express was set up in 2012 as a pure play logistics supplier for ecommerce portals. Before it was set up, in 2011 Delhivery was set up. So, Ecom express is not first.

While others tried to grow aggressively into many cities and into different categories, Krishnan (CEO & Founder of Ecom express) says that they chose to perfect one city before moving to another. Otherwise, they would be spreading the capital thin on many cities. Just like Damani they seem to have taken experiences from each city into the next city.

Also, Krishnan says that they are not interested right now in local delivery of groceries etc., because it is not viable right now. They economics don't work with such low volumes. Logistics is expensive.

Sources: 

Cox & Kings
Interview with CFO, Anil Khandelwal, Mint Newspaper, Oct 20, 2016 (original source: Interview on CNBC TV18, Oct 19, 2016)

Makemytrip
http://www.livemint.com/Money/2h2MuHNF72HyiW3GGY8T3N/Along-With-Ibibo-MakeMyTrip-also-gets-absurd-private-market.html







Investors are holding $50 trillion in cash.


Why are investors hoarding so much money? BlackRock's CEO Larry Fink weighed in on the question Tuesday: "I don't believe the people are sitting there because they're just worried about the next event. A lot of people just don't feel like investing has been that fair to them."

Blackrock knows about big numbers. It manages $5 trillion, which is higher than GDP of Japan. US GDP is about $15 trillion and China's about $10 trillion.

Bloomberg developed markets bond index yields have fallen from about 2% in 2011 & 2012 to about 0.5% in 2016.

Perhaps no extra income is better than the less-than-nothing promised by government bonds in Europe and Japan.

But cash is an unsustainable proposition for pensions, retirees, insurance companies and many others who expect to earn some sort of return on their assets.

This money is poised to rush in at the mere hint of a prolonged selloff, which means it will act as a buffer against just such a thing.

The amount of cash investors are holding could act as a safety net for falling markets. This money will come in when markets correct.

https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2016-10-19/-50-trillion-cash-safety-net-aches-for-a-market-fall

People will eventually realize value

ben

-from Ben Graham's testimony to the US Senate Committee on Banking & Currency on March,1955

Source; alphaideas 

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

4 tips from Shankar Sharma



1. Look for negative momentum in stocks, which is much easier to identity. I am not taking about months, but years. We are interested in loss-making or near-loss making companies. We are not interested in profitable companies.

What goes up must come down.

2. The opposite is also true - what goes down, must come up. A company with clean management with potential to come out of trouble, the stock of the company could offer higher returns.

3. Stocks which are under-weight within a sector tend to do better.

4. One should not fancy the crowded space. In an overweight stock, when the chances of big institutional investors putting in additional money go down, the stock tends to languish


4. The fourth criteria is to look for 'just one' spark. iPod was the trigger for Apple. For Tata Motors, it was new JLR launch.

"I have spoken about it many-many times that was the spark that when I saw the JLR cars, I thought that these cars are enough for the company to get X market share from a very low base. Hopefully then if they get that market share, the number that I came up with was $500 million of profit. It was a big swing from a billion dollar loss to a $500 million profit. So, you just need that one spark"

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/4-tips-from-shankar-sharma-to-make-vc-type-returns-in-stocks/articleshow/54930971.cms?curator=alphaideas&utm_source=alphaideas



The long run is just a collection of short runs

1. Every idea sometimes is taken too far. For example, the fact that short run is not so important, only long run.

2. Bill Gates said in their early days at Microsoft:

"I came up with this incredibly conservative approach that I wanted to have enough money in the bank to pay a year’s worth of payroll even if we didn’t get any payments coming in. I’ve been almost true to that the whole time."

3. Economist Tyler Cowen recently wrote:

"Plenty of companies have made big mistakes from thinking too big and too long-term; for instance, a lot of mergers were based on notions of long-run synergies that never materialized. In reality, short-term improvements are often the best way to get to a good long-run plan."

4. Long run is infact nothing but a lot of successful short runs.

http://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/the-long-run-is-just-a-collection-of-short-runs/

Artificial Intelligence - will it lead to global deflation?


AI is likely to lead to large number of job losses. And even people who have jobs are likely to have low incomes. Hence, people will not have purchasing power. This could lead to deflation.

What Japan has experienced over the last 2.5 decades, the developed world including US, Europe, UK could see Japan like deflation over the next few decades.

While central banks and finance minster are trying to avoid Japan like situation, I think it will be difficult to avoid such a situation.

Often, Japan is blamed for not doing enough. But perhaps, the fact is there isn't much that Japan could have done to avoid deflation.

Similar could be the case with other developed countries.

Is there a way out?

Perhaps, if developing and under-developed countries start consuming more because of their sheer demographics, then overall world growth may pick up. US and Japan and other developed countries could make investments in these countries, and thus improve their growth prospects for their companies and countries.

World is expected to add 2.5bn people between 2000 and 2030 and 1.2bn people between 2030 and 2050. This is like adding India and China by 2030 and adding India between 2030 and 2050. So, demographics could come to the rescue of world growth.

But investments have to come from developed countries.

http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/yH6zh11sW2N5qyxkPAG8BJ/Groping-in-the-dark.html

World population likely to increase by 2.4 billion between 2000 and 2030 (roughly equal to total of India's and China's population)

Below is the article by Shyam Kadka, representative of India at UN's FAO, published in Mint on Oct 18, 2016

1. The global population in 2000 - 6.1 billion
Estimated to reach in 2030 - 8.5 billion (an addition of 2.4bn or 240 crores~roughly equal to India & China population)
Estimated to reach in 2050 - 9.7 billion (an addition of 1.2bn or 120 crores~roughly equal to India's population)

2. India's arable land is only 2.4% of the world's arable land and more than 17% of global population.

3. Meeting the demand for food to feed this growing population is a challenge.

***

1. Climate determines the agricultural production systems of the world.

2. To address the food security issue, we need to understand climate, soil and agriculture production continuum.

3. Healthy, living soil is the basis of food security and nutrition.

Soil organisms account for a quarter of the planet's biodiversity. Soil invertebrates perform the vital functions which ensure nutritional content, and help maintain soil structure and health. Soil also performs functional role of water storage and purification.

4. However, expansion and intensification of agriculture, including crops, livestock, and forest based systems, has led to soil degradation and loss of biodiversity and human health.

5. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) puts high priority on restoring degraded soils, sustainable management of land and water resources.

6. The practices include organic farming, zero-tillage, crop rotation, and conservation agriculture.


http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/mjDLZ4wCTDH39or6aXpWpJ/Hunger-solutions-from-the-soil.html




Consumption, and demographics will drive Indian businesses and hence stocks

The following was the statement made by Kunal Kapoor, Global President, Morningstar at Morningstar Conference in Mumbai on Oct 17-18, 2016

Consumption, and demographics will drive Indian businesses and hence stocks.


***

The following are few highlights of Kunal Kapoor's interview in Mint newspaper on Oct 18, 2016

Diversified long-term portfolio

1. We are big believers in diversified long-term portfolio.

That may be disappointing to someone who live and die by the next hot idea and returns over next 1 or 2 months.

When one builds a portfolio with assets like equity, if one can't hold for 3-5 years, then one should not probably own them.

US Elections, interest rates rising - volatility 

2. From a long-term investor perspective, ultimately, if one invests in a good business, you tend to be okay regardless of what happens in one or two elections.

When I look at the environment, the thing that impacts equities meaningfully is interest rates. In the short run, interest rates can be a source of volatility. In the long term, it probably doesn't matter. Our view doesn't change.


Punjab's area is only 1.5% of India, yet it produced 60% of wheat and 35% of rice over the last 2 decades



1. Punjab is the 'granary' of India. Although, it accounts for only 1.5% of India's geographical area, over the past two decades it has contributed 35% of India's rice output and 60% of its wheat.

2. Groundwater irrigates 75% of land in Punjab. However, groundwater is rapidly depleting. Thirty years ago farmers had to dig upto 10 metres (32 feet) for water, in 2015 farmers have to dig upto 20 metres (64 feet). Water levels are dropping by 40 cm (16inches) per year.

3. Rice and wheat make up 80% of Punjab's irrigated crops.Rice requires lot of water, so farmers resort to heavy usage of groundwater.

4. About 3.5 million of Punjab's 9.1 million workers depend on agriculture or associated activities.

5. To address the water problem, farmers will have to move to less-thirsty crops like pulses, maize, oil-seeds, vegetables, and sugarcane.

Source: The Financial Express, Oct 18, 2016

Bubble or imbalance in China property market?


1. In 2016, despite high property prices and increase in property prices, Chinese customers are rushing to see show apartments.

2. Some had hoped to wait for the market to cool but capitulated (My note: This is a sure sign of bubble nearing it's burst) and bought as prices climbed week after week.

Flats in the area (northern regions of Shanghai), the once rural village of Malu, still dotted with fields and scruff wholesale markets, now costs 90% more than a year ago. "It feels like a bubble" says a real estate agent (although real estate agents are a smooth talking, self-assured lot in China, like everywhere else in the world).

3. House prices have climbed 16% in China over last year, and 32% or 48% in bigger cities.

4. Surveys indicate that 20% of the buyers are investors, and 60% are investors in core areas of mid-sized cities.

5. The worrying aspect is the increase in property borrowing by developers. Zhang Zhewei of Deutsche Bank says that developers are facing Prisoner's Dilemma; if they are too conservative, they will be squeezed out; so they choose to be aggressive.

They have driven up land prices by 66% this year, according to an index of 100 cities.

6. Sharp rise in house prices doesn't match with economic picture of China. Incomes have not been growing in the slow growing economy.

7. Many have been predicting Chinese real estate bubble burst for the last decade. However, it has not been happened.

In China, people usually don't borrow as much as in other countries. The down payment rules are strict. In China, people put even upto 50% in cash upfront. So, even if the home prices fall, they will continue to pay their mortgage installments.

On the whole, the household balance sheets are in good shape.

8. Bubble' may be a misdiagnosis. The real pathology is a severe imbalance in land supply.

Smaller cities have plenty of land, but shrinking population. Bigger cities where people want to live and work are sitting on large land banks but releasing only small plots.

Shanghai has about 1800 sq km of farm land but only sold 5 sq km of land for housing last year. The result has been soaring house prices. (My note: Mumbai city (not including Navi Mumbai and Thane) is about 500 sq km. So, Shanghai has 3 times the land of Mumbai city lying vacant.)

Why not increase sale of land? Big cities will lose their income. Land sales are a source of revenue for cities. Smaller cities are hoping that high land prices in big cities will send people their way.

So, the problem is as much political as economic. (My note: Economics will triumph eventually, although in the short-term politics may win. The bubble is likely to burst anytime. Investors will stop buying flats once they see the value of flats depreciating rather than appreciating.)

Source: Financial Express, Oct 18, 2016 (original source: The Economist)

Failure affects traders and their trading ability



Martin Seligman, professor of psychology at University of Pennsylvania, did various experiments to show that often people learn helplessness when they suffer setbacks. He showed this phenomenon initially using experiments with dogs.

A first group of dogs were given shock and if they attempted to escape, they were allowed to escape.

A second group of dogs were given shock but even if they attempted to escape, they were not allowed to escape. After few such shocks, the second group of dogs did not attempt to escape even if they were now given the option to escape[1]. In our context, investors possibly give up when they themselves fail or see others fail.

As per psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, people (investors/traders) usually make decisions and judgments based on biases rather than on rationality (or statistics)[2]. Few instances of failure could form a bias in the investors/traders, ignoring statistics.

So, yes, few instances of losses (or even profits) can influence an traders. That could be the reason why traders may be  giving up before they make big money.



[1] Seligman, Martin, Learned Optimism, New York: Vintage Books, 2006
[2] Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, fast and slow, Great Britan: Allen Lane, 2011

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

How Rakesh Jhunjhunwala got started


My father was also interested in stocks. When I was a young child, he and his friends would drink in the evening and discuss about the stock market. I would listen to them and one day I asked him why do these prices fluctuate.
He told me to check if there is a news item on Gwalior Rayon in the newspaper, and if there was Gwalior Rayon’s price would fluctuate the next day.
I found it very interesting and I got fascinated by stocks, I self-taught myself. My father told me to do whatever I wanted in life but at least get professionally qualified.
I was always a reasonably good student so I took up chartered accountancy. In January 1985, I completed my CA. I told my father I wanted to go to the stock market. My father reacted by telling me not to ask him or any of his friends for money. He, however, told me that I could live in the house in Mumbai and that if I did not do well in the market I could always earn my livelihood as chartered accountant. This sense of security really drove me in life.
Between 1986 and 1989 I must have earned Rs 20-25 lakhs. After 1986, the market went into a big depression for two three years but I put that money in Tata Power and the Tata Power stocks became about 1100-1200.
Now I was worth Rs 50-55 lakhs.
Sesa Goa had a big fall because there was a depression in the iron ore industry and then prices for the next year had been considerably raised about 20-25%. The stock was available abysmally cheap around Rs. 25-26. There was a projection of a very good growth in profitability in the next year but nobody seemed to believe it.
When I saw the facts, I wanted to invest but I did not have capital.
I bought 4 lakh shares of Sesa Goa in forward trading, worth Rs 1 crore. I sold about 2-2.5 lakh shares at Rs 60-65 and another 1 lakh at Rs 150-175. The prices then went up to Rs 2200 and I sold some shares. I did some other trading too. I had net worth of about Rs 2 – 2.5 crore.
-said Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Monday, 17 October 2016

Cash



cu-acrwusaahb4a

Advertising Budget Size - typically 10% of sales

10% of Sales

Globally, companies spend 10% of their sales. This is the budget for all types of advertising & promotions. There is no precise science behind this number. It's more like an accepted industry practice. Anything above this usually attracts the boards attention.

How much to spend on Trade marketing?

There are several variables at play though when looking at how much Trade Marketing / Marketing budget to allocate.

1. The Type of distribution channel - how structured / how do those channels behave
2. The Face of the Competition - How crowded is that market ? many players or few ?
3. The Consumer Target Segments - What is the positioning of the product (Product mix)

The % of spend on trade marketing vs other tactics varies depending on the above.

Trade marketing spend is mainly targeted at growing Numeric distribution (market penetration),  at growing Turnover (sell-through), to some extent at driving Customers into stores and at building positive Brand perception (in-store experience). Whereas other tactics are aimed at building your brand awareness (or new product awareness), at engaging with customers (loyalty and after sales service).

It's worth noting that sometimes Trade marketing is also used as a mean of regulation for logistical or sales forecast adjustments (ie. too much stock in channel - need a promo to sell out).

Structured Distribution will push manufacturers to allocate 3 to 5% of turnover on Trade marketing at key calendar times in the year (Christmas, Back to School, Father's day, Mother's day etc...). Once again it really is industry and market dependent. Trading terms are negotiated on a per product / per market basis with each channel.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-budget-a-FMCG-company-has-to-spend-on-trade-marketing

***

Marketing budget, not sales budget, typically runs between 3-15% depending on industry, company size, and management strategy.

In a large company with >$1billion in sales, a 3% advertising budget is fairly nice size.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-average-marketing-budgets-for-a-BtoB-industrial-company-in-percentage-of-the-turnover


***

Indian FMCG companies, typically advertising spend is 13% of sales

Hindustan Unilever - 13%
Colgate - 13%
Dabur - 13% (70% on advertising; 30% on promotions)
Godrej Consumer - 10%  (65% on advertising; 35% on promotions)
Amul - 1% (yes, just one percent, may be because margins are low in milk business) (85% on advertising; 15% on promotions)

In high clutter categories like soaps, hair oil, companies have to spend more to stand out from their competition.

Pricing

Reducing pricing is a catch-22 situation. Because on one hand, it increase volume, but reduces margins. Reduction in margins leaves little for investing in brands. When there is no investment, then volumes suffer.


http://www.financialexpress.com/archive/fmcg-cos-raise-ad-spend-slash-budget-for-promotions/1250512/

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/cons-products/fmcg/despite-high-spend-on-advertisements-fmcg-companies-such-as-hul-dabur-colgate-palmolive-others-see-low-volume-growth/articleshow/18341938.cms



15 of the 20 best performing startups of the last five years raised less than $125M from venture capitalists



This is an extra-ordinary article on venture capital funding in silicon valley and capital efficiency.

Note that successful companies have raised very little capital, compared to lot of capital being raised by current start-ups like uber, flipkart etc.,


10-14-efficient-entrepreneurship-best-companies-founder-collective-tally-final


10-14-efficient-entrepreneurship-master-stats-all-companies-founder-collective

10-14-efficient-entrepreneurship-master-stats-all-companies-excluding-facebook-founder-collective


10-14-efficient-entrepreneurship-median-company-founder-collective

10-14-efficient-entrepreneurship-34-vs-200_average-founder-collective

https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/15/overdosing-on-vc-lessons-from-71-ipos/






8 million Americans unemployed and looking for work while nearly 6 million jobs remain unfilled


With nearly 8 million Americans unemployed and looking for work while nearly 6 million jobs remain unfilled, it’s fair to say that technology has not disrupted the labor market in a good way.

https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/16/the-hiring-game/

Summary


Things that make a difference in investing

1. Compound Interest 

- It is not easy to appreciate the importance of compound interest
- It is called 8th wonder in the world
- Few percentage points can make a huge difference over a long period of time

2. Systematic Investment Plan / Regular Investing works

- Investing regularly, say every week or month, ensures averaging of prices.

3. Asset allocation 

Equities are the best asset over a long period.




Infosys splits four verticals into 15 smaller units - with P&L responsibility to each unit head

1. Infosys re-organized itself into 'smaller units' to make it more manageable 

2. P&L responsibility for the unit heads

3.  Presidents' time to be freed up for strategic work 

4. This kind of smaller units was something that TCS has been doing for the past 4-5 years. It has worked successfully for TCS.

5. Organization structure - for very large organizations, making smaller units with P&L responsibility seems to work.



****

Oct 17 2016 : The Times of India (Hyderabad)
Bengaluru


Around 15 Executives Get P&L Responsibilities; Presidents Get Time For Building Newer Strategy
Infosys has announced some details of a new organizational and managerial structure designed to give its presidents more time to build CXO-level relationships and strategy than be bogged down by internal operational matters, and provide for more agility for its business units to sharpen client focus and improve sales effectiveness.

Under the new structure, its four large industry verticals will be split into some 15 smaller industry units, each with $500-$700 million in revenue, separate head, and profit & loss (P&L) responsibilities. The four large verticals now are banking & financial services and insurance (BFSI), with $3 billion in revenue; retail & life sciences, with $2.3 billion; manufacturing & hi-tech, with $2.2 billion; and energy & utilities, communications and services, with $1.9 billion.

BFSI, which counts Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs among its key accounts, will now have four industry heads ­ Jasmeet Singh, VP and regional head for financial services in the US (excluding West Coast), Ajay Vij and Kannan Amaresh, both VPs & regional heads of financial services in Europe, and Andrew Groth, VP of Australia and New Zealand, who will also lead financial services and insurance for the rest of the world. All four will report to president and financial services head Mohit Joshi. Healthcare and life sciences will be a separate unit, and will be headed by former Wipro veteran Sangita Singh who is joining Infosys on Monday . She too will report to Joshi. “The industry heads will be responsible for strategy for sales, P&L and increasing customer footprint. This will ensure greater client focus through the industry heads while allowing the presidents to focus on enterprise strategy ,“ wrote COO U B Pravin Rao in an email to all business unit heads. Rao said the industry heads have been identified based on the current size and future potential of the business opportunities. The energy & utilities, communications and services vertical is now split among three executives ­Anurag Sinha will lead tele com, media and entertainment in the US, Avichal Kulshrestha will lead the same in Europe, and Ashiss Kumar Dash will head resources and utilities. All three will report to president Rajesh Krishnamurthy .

In manufacturing, retail, CPG and logistics (MRCL), Dinesh Bajaj and Madhu Janardhan will lead the Americas for RCL, Nitesh Bansal will head manufacturing in the US, and Karmesh Vaswani will lead MRCL-Europe.All three will report to president Sandeep Dadlani, as will Nitesh Banga, who will lead sales of new services, and Sourav Banerjee, who continues as client partner for Apple, one of Infosys's top clients, and who will now also oversee other Silicon Valley tech accounts.



http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31809&articlexml=Infosys-splits-four-verticals-into-15-smaller-units-17102016013032

Sunday, 16 October 2016

Software industry charges $20-24 per hour for off-shore work

1. Software industry charges $20-24 per hour for off-shore work.

2. And $70-90 an hour for on-site work.

3. Indian software industry is about $110 billion in size (Observation: Infosys is about $8bn in revenue. So, Infosys is only about 7% of the Indian software industry. So, there are lots and lots of small and medium size companies operating in this space.)

4. "The total installed base of software on which global corporations operate is around $4 trillion, and this is not going to disappear tomorrow. Yes, the nature of work will slowly evolve, as it has often over the last 20 years, but Indian IT companies will understand this evolution and will manage the change."

http://www.ndtv.com/opinion/no-obit-needed-our-software-industry-is-alive-and-kicking-1474789?

Retirement


Even in Retirement, one may need to buy 3-4 washing machines, 2-3 cars, and may be even a house.

My observation: People typically use white goods for may be maximum of 10 years and cars for may be 7 years. Then, they may have to be replaced. That's why there is replacement demand. And that's how economy keeps humming - that's how we get economic growth.


http://www.subramoney.com/2016/10/retirement-a-reminder/?curator=alphaideas&utm_source=alphaideas

Good habits

Virtually all his outperformance has come from taking big sector bets,”

Curiosity is important for an investor - Henry Kravis

Below are few notes from interview with Henry Kravis, KKR.

It's been about 40 years ago, he started his firm and with that the 'private equity industry'

"if I can take one thing other than integrity and instill that in people, I’d want it to be curiosity. Because to me, people who are curious are going to be better investors and better stewards of others’ money. If there’s no curiosity, you’re basically doing something that’s already been done by someone else."

"worry about what you might lose on the downside" "you don't have to worry about what you make on the upside"

At KKR, built a culture where everyone shares what the firm earns, even if the employee is not part of the deal. This was in stark contrast to Bear Sterns where they worked earlier, where an employee got a share of his kill.

Private equity industry has become quite competitive now compared to 40 years ago when KKR started.

http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-henry-kravis-interview/

Friday, 14 October 2016

Experience of investing in penny stocks for 15 years - not much returns



Wes Gray (Alpha Architect)

For nearly 15 years I traded deep value penny stock type ideas with a decent amount of turnover. We’re talking 10mm market cap companies — sometimes smaller. Seeing a limit book with 10k shares @ 5cents and 20k shares @ 10 cents? No problem. I’ll buy 50k @ .075 and split the difference. The stock is worth 20cent, so what’s a 25% b/d spread gonna do in the long-run?

Long story short, I made a lot of money, lost a lot of money (still riding a carry loss forward from 2011!), pissed a lot of money away on taxes and frictional costs, and learned a lot of lessons that define my current approach to investing.

In the end, I would have arguably been way better off following a simple low brain damage approach…

http://www.basonasset.com/a-collection-of-regrets/

Monday, 10 October 2016

Contracts are just an incredibly powerful way of thinking about parts of economics

Oliver Hart - Interview

"My first action was to hug my wife, wake up my younger son who is up for the weekend, so in the house, and I actually spoke to my fellow Laureate"

Telephone interview with Oliver Hart following the announcement of The 2016 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. The interviewer is Adam Smith, Chief Scientific Officer of Nobel Media.
Oliver Hart: Hello.
Adam Smith: Hello, this is Adam Smith, calling from Nobelprize.org the official website of the Nobel Prize in Stockholm, Sweden.
OH: Yes.
AS: Congratulations on the award of the Prize.
OH: Well, thank you very much, I'm absolutely thrilled.
AS: How did you hear the news?
OH: Well I got a call at about, I think two minutes past five.
AS: And it woke you?
OH: I have to admit I was awake. I hadn't been awake for long, but you know such is life. I think I woke at about 4:40 and was wondering whether it was getting too late for it to be this year, but then fortunately the phone rang.
AS: Gosh, what a thrilling feeling of excitement and relief then, when it came.
OH: Well it was, yes it was rather amazing.
AS: What was you first action after hearing?
OH: My first action was to hug my wife, wake up my younger son who is up for the weekend, so in the house, and then I actually spoke to my fellow Laureate, Bengt Holmström, who's a friend of mine, a great friend of mine. I knew he knew and I gave him a call, so we had a chat.
AS: Am I right in thinking in was your birthday yesterday?
OH: It was, yes it was.
AS: That's a nice present then, to receive, a little late.
OH: It's a lovely present. Friends of mine said I have a decent a shot at this for a few years and it's always around my birthday, which actually makes celebrating my birthday a little tricky. This is always in the background, and that was certainly true yesterday. So it's going to be, you know, one of the smaller benefits of winning the Prize, is in the future I will be able to celebrate my birthday without thinking about it. A minor thing, but still.
AS: Interestingly, you're the fifth Laureate this year to have been born and educated in the UK but then to have moved to the US.
OH: Yes, I noticed that. Yes, and that was true of the one last year. Angus Deaton was in that category too. I think it says two things. The British education system is really quite good, but certainly there was a period when the opportunities to actually develop one's work were better in the US.
AS: Just one last question. This is for your contributions to contract theory, so it will introduce lots of people around the world to contract theory. What do you hope it brings to the field, the award?
OH: Well, I think contract theory… contracts are just an incredibly powerful way of thinking about parts of economics. I mean they're just fundamental, the whole idea that trade is a quid pro quo, there are two sides to a transaction and that any transaction that you have in economics, whether it's between a buyer and a seller or an employer and an employee or a creditor and a debtor, that the way the thing is structured, you know, is very useful to think of it as being done to increase efficiency so both sides have an incentive to construct the transaction in the most, so that it generates the greatest value. You know, even a simple thing like people often think that one side dictates the terms to the other side. It may look like that but actually even then the side dictating the terms wants to choose terms which are acceptable to the other side and generate the most value because if there's money left on the table then you can write a better contract, so in a way it's a very good side to economic transactions, and you see it through the design of the contract.
AS: Thank you.
OH: I don't know whether that made any sense? I think it's something that people truly lose sight of.
AS: It made a lot of sense. It was beautifully explained and especially beautifully explained so early in the morning after receiving such news.
OH: Well, that's right. Well, I could do better later in the day. Thanks a lot, nice to talk to you.
AS: Congratulations.
OH: Bye bye now.

Research is a trip, and you have to be attentive to all the things you see and be able also to move away from the planned path.

Bengt Holmström - Interview

Telephone interview with Bengt Holmström following the announcement of The 2016 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. The interviewer is Adam Smith, Chief Scientific Officer of Nobel Media.

Bengt Holmström: Hello.
Adam Smith: Oh, hello. May I speak to Professor Holmström please?
BH: Speaking.
AS: Ah, this is Adam Smith calling from Nobelprize.org, the official website of the Nobel Prize in Stockholm. Congratulations on the Prize in Economic Sciences.
BH: Yes, thank you.
AS: First of all, you are a Finn but of the Swedish speaking minority population. Does that make it especially meaningful to receive this Swedish prize?
BH: Yes, of course, I mean the Nobel Prize is very special, but being a Finn and a Swedish-speaking Finn, and seeing Stockholm is my second home town, you know, it's very special for me. My family, a big part of my family lives there.
AS: How did you actually hear the news this morning?
BH: Yeah, I was woken up and I thought it was a reminder of taking my medication, and then I learnt that it was not about medication, it was about the Prize.
AS: It's a nice surprise.
BH: It was a very nice surprise, yes.
AS: Oliver Hart said that he phoned you early.
BH: Yes, Oliver Hart, I'm so glad that I won it with him. He's my closest friend here, and you know we have worked together and talked together over the years, and he has been a great inspiration for my research.
AS: One thing I read was that you are a proponent of using the blackboard, the chalkboard, when teaching. You never use slides. That seems quite surprising these days.
BH: I use slides when I give seminars, but I would say that I like to look at people that teach from the blackboard and I teach myself from the blackboard.
AS: I suppose it aids thinking.
BH: Well it's much easier for the people to think, and it gives you the freedom to go wherever the lecture goes. I'm not a person who plans exactly what I'm going to say. It depends on what questions people ask and what they want to talk about. My lectures are never the same even though the title may be the same.
AS: Could you extend that process to talking about your own research, that you just see which avenues you follow next, you allow yourself freedom?
BH: Well I think you have to have a goal, but yes research that takes its own path, an unexpected path, that's a very essential part of doing research. So research that exactly goes where you expected it to go is uninteresting on the whole. You need to start travelling somewhere, you know you have to decide you want to get to Stockholm, but if on the way, you know, you see Paris you may want to stop there, to give you a sort of metaphorical answer. Research is a trip, and you have to be attentive to all the things you see and be able also to move away from the planned path.
AS: The Prize will of course focus the world's attention on contract theory, and I imagine it is increasingly important given the growing public debate about incentives, and corporate governance, and public versus private provision of services etc.
BH: Yes. But I want to emphasise that it's not just about money. People have a very narrow view of incentives, but one can say that almost everything in economics is about incentives, but if you look at incentive theory what has happened is that instead of just focussing on some ways to pay people so that they do certain things, it's very much about structuring their jobs or structuring the organisation in a way that motivates. So the issue of motivation is hugely broader than just asking you know how should people get the CEO to behave in a particular way, and financial monetary incentives are in some sense too effective often. They are very powerful in sending signals as well as, of course, rewarding finically. And so one has to be very careful in their use.
AS: That's very interesting. So one must think more broadly.
BH: Yes. So not paying people is also an incentive, if one wants to put it that way. Sometimes no financial incentive is the best incentive.
AS: Now you're in for a day, I suppose, of constant interviews and conversations. How does that strike you?
BH: Well, it's another twist. You know I take it where it goes. I follow where it goes. I have no idea what's ahead.
AS: Well I wish you every success and joy in your journey into the unknown today.
BH: Thank you very much.
AS: We very much look forward to welcoming you to Stockholm in December.
BH: Yes, I am fully intending to come. Thanks so much.
AS: Thank you.

Incentives - design an optimal contract for an agent (the company’s CEO), whose action is partly unobserved by the principal (shareholders)

The long and the short of contracts

Modern economies are held together by innumerable contracts. The new theoretical tools created by Hart and Holmström are valuable to the understanding of real-life contracts and institutions, as well as potential pitfalls in contract design.

Society’s many contractual relationships include those between shareholders and top executive management, an insurance company and car owners, or a public authority and its suppliers. As such relationships typically entail conflicts of interest, contracts must be properly designed to ensure that the parties take mutually beneficial decisions. This year’s laureates have developed contract theory, a comprehensive framework for analysing many diverse issues in contractual design, like performance-based pay for top executives, deductibles and co-pays in insurance, and the privatisation of public-sector activities.

In the late 1970s, Bengt Holmström demonstrated how a principal (e.g., a company’s shareholders) should design an optimal contract for an agent (the company’s CEO), whose action is partly unobserved by the principal. Holmström’s informativeness principle stated precisely how this contract should link the agent’s pay to performance-relevant information. Using the basic principal-agent model, he showed how the optimal contract carefully weighs risks against incentives. In later work, Holmström generalised these results to more realistic settings, namely: when employees are not only rewarded with pay, but also with potential promotion; when agents expend effort on many tasks, while principals observe only some dimensions of performance; and when individual members of a team can free-ride on the efforts of others.

In the mid-1980s, Oliver Hart made fundamental contri-butions to a new branch of contract theory that deals with the important case of incomplete contracts. Because it is impossible for a contract to specify every eventuality, this branch of the theory spells out optimal allocations of control rights: which party to the contract should be entitled to make decisions in which circumstances? Hart’s findings on incomplete contracts have shed new light on the ownership and control of businesses and have had a vast impact on several fields of economics, as well as political science and law. His research provides us with new theoretical tools for studying questions such as which kinds of companies should merge, the proper mix of debt and equity financing, and when institutions such as schools or prisons ought to be privately or publicly owned.

Through their initial contributions, Hart and Holmström launched contract theory as a fertile field of basic research. Over the last few decades, they have also explored many of its applications. Their analysis of optimal contractual arrangements lays an intellectual foundation for designing policies and institutions in many areas, from bankruptcy legislation to political constitutions.

Source: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2016/press.html

GDP may raise post natural calamities, but we may be poorer because of loss to economic assets existing stock


In the context of Hurricane Mathew damages of $4 to 6 billion

1. GDP may raise post natural calamities like Hurricanes.

2. However, we may be poorer because real economic assets were destroyed.

3. Even if we rebuild those destroyed assets, we are still poorer because we could have used those resources to build alternate economic assets (opportunity cost).

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/10/09/hurricane-matthew-damages-at-4-to-6-billion-yes-this-will-increase-gdp/#65a485759266

All economics is about 'incentives' - 2016 Economics Nobel Prize Winner Bengt Holmstrom


1. "All of economics is about incentives. This is about incentive contracting. This is about trying to motivate people to do things that are mutually beneficial," Holmstrom said.

2. "Contract theory considers, for example, whether managers should get paid bonuses or stock options, or whether teachers or healthcare workers should be paid fixed rates or by performance-based criteria."

3. "Note that it’s not just about the private sector. We really are trying to work out that perfect mixture of carrots and sticks to beat the principal agent problem. Which is that when we hire someone to do something for us, fix us, run our business, teach our children, their interests are not aligned with our own. They want to do the least amount of fixing, teaching or running, for the maximum amount of money. We’d rather like the opposite, the maximum output with the minimum cost or input. So, how do we construct our employment contract in order to align interests?"

4. "Mistakes have been made in the design of executive compensation. The biggest design flaw is that they didn't force the executives to hold onto to their incentives for longer" said Homstrom.

5. "So, how should we construct incentives in order to gain the goal that we actually desire from whatever activity it is that is happening? And no, the answer just isn’t “more money.”"

6. "There are two central ideas in economics:
One - Incentives matter
Two - There is always an opportunity cost (there is no such thing as a free lunch).

And if you get those two ideas you will indeed have the core structure of economics at your fingertips. Opportunity costs means that there are always costs to doing something. Those costs being, at the very minimum, the lost opportunity to be doing all of the other things that you could have done instead. There simply isn’t anything at all that is without cost. It may well be that the benefits are greater than those costs, but nothing at all is without costs."

7. "And the first one, incentives matter, is the part that the Nobel was awarded for today. Not the observation of course, but the detailed examination of how this actually works out in life. Something we’d like to know as we’d like to know how to construct the incentives that get us to where we want to go".


Sources:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/10/oliver-hart-bengt-holmstrom-win-nobel-prize-in-economics.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/10/10/economics-nobel-for-exploring-the-central-contention-of-economics-incentives-matter/#1894c7c177da


What is the purpose of a life or a country? To maximize wealth or to maximize utility?


Summary from an article written in the context of Brexit.

1. There is good evidence that immigration is good for the economy.

2. But there is nothing which states that maximizing wealth is the purpose in life.

3. Even economists don't insist that personal wealth maximization is the goal - it's utility maximization which is.

(And if Britons insist that not having 5 million immigrants increases utility, that's upto them. Utility function after all are entirely personal.)
Note: 5 million is a very large number, do these people have to leave Britain on Brexit date?

Soucre: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/10/10/the-brexit-conundrum-freedom-of-movement-means-only-hard-or-clean-brexit-is-possible/#48cc5b5ffd71